<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pragmatism in Debian</title>
	<atom:link href="http://raphaelhertzog.com/2005/06/17/pragmatism-in-debian/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://raphaelhertzog.com/2005/06/17/pragmatism-in-debian/</link>
	<description>Insider infos, master your Debian/Ubuntu distribution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 08:29:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ Ray</title>
		<link>http://raphaelhertzog.com/2005/06/17/pragmatism-in-debian/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 14:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ouaza.com/wordpress/2005/06/17/pragmatism-in-debian/#comment-59</guid>
		<description>The first paragraph was about you. The rest was inspired by or related to you.

Right now, I want to fix the firefox logo only to avoid the trademark danger, but it should be obvious it&#039;s not something &quot;where nothing can go wrong&quot;. It might be offensive or illegal for someone, or even just suboptimal for a particular display device, so I don&#039;t think debian should give up the freedom to fix these sort of things. We can&#039;t take into account uncertain future outcomes, but this is pretty obvious because we&#039;ve seen similar things before. The freedom to edit artwork is useful.

A long-term success is better than a short-term one. A pragmatist doesn&#039;t mind working sometimes. Free replacements don&#039;t appear just because the non-free isn&#039;t in debian, but it helps to point out the problem and encourage attention. The debian approach could be described as long-term pragmatism: solving problems forever, not just a quick-fix for now. For the short-term, you have other tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first paragraph was about you. The rest was inspired by or related to you.</p>
<p>Right now, I want to fix the firefox logo only to avoid the trademark danger, but it should be obvious it&#8217;s not something &#8220;where nothing can go wrong&#8221;. It might be offensive or illegal for someone, or even just suboptimal for a particular display device, so I don&#8217;t think debian should give up the freedom to fix these sort of things. We can&#8217;t take into account uncertain future outcomes, but this is pretty obvious because we&#8217;ve seen similar things before. The freedom to edit artwork is useful.</p>
<p>A long-term success is better than a short-term one. A pragmatist doesn&#8217;t mind working sometimes. Free replacements don&#8217;t appear just because the non-free isn&#8217;t in debian, but it helps to point out the problem and encourage attention. The debian approach could be described as long-term pragmatism: solving problems forever, not just a quick-fix for now. For the short-term, you have other tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

