<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rewriting update-alternatives in C</title>
	<atom:link href="http://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/05/27/rewriting-update-alternatives-in-c/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/05/27/rewriting-update-alternatives-in-c/</link>
	<description>Insider infos, master your Debian/Ubuntu distribution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 08:29:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reini Urban</title>
		<link>http://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/05/27/rewriting-update-alternatives-in-c/#comment-3173</link>
		<dc:creator>Reini Urban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 20:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphaelhertzog.com/?p=271#comment-3173</guid>
		<description>perl can also compile to native code. B::C</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>perl can also compile to native code. B::C</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quick news: dpkg, collab-maint, alioth and the future &#124; apt-get install debian-wizard</title>
		<link>http://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/05/27/rewriting-update-alternatives-in-c/#comment-3164</link>
		<dc:creator>Quick news: dpkg, collab-maint, alioth and the future &#124; apt-get install debian-wizard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphaelhertzog.com/?p=271#comment-3164</guid>
		<description>[...] part and the great news: dpkg 1.15.8 (to be uploaded soon) will no longer need perl! After my changes to rewrite update-alternatives in C, Guillem recently pushed the rewrite of dpkg-divert/mksplit in C. Please test it out (binary [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] part and the great news: dpkg 1.15.8 (to be uploaded soon) will no longer need perl! After my changes to rewrite update-alternatives in C, Guillem recently pushed the rewrite of dpkg-divert/mksplit in C. Please test it out (binary [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buxy</title>
		<link>http://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/05/27/rewriting-update-alternatives-in-c/#comment-3109</link>
		<dc:creator>Buxy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 04:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphaelhertzog.com/?p=271#comment-3109</guid>
		<description>@Ewoud: thanks, fixed the link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ewoud: thanks, fixed the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden</title>
		<link>http://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/05/27/rewriting-update-alternatives-in-c/#comment-3108</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 19:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphaelhertzog.com/?p=271#comment-3108</guid>
		<description>Your dpkg roadmap link is broken. The M in roadmap should be uppercase as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your dpkg roadmap link is broken. The M in roadmap should be uppercase as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buxy</title>
		<link>http://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/05/27/rewriting-update-alternatives-in-c/#comment-3106</link>
		<dc:creator>Buxy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 07:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphaelhertzog.com/?p=271#comment-3106</guid>
		<description>@funktree: first the rewrite is already done so I won&#039;t redo it a second time. Then I never used haskell and dpkg is only C+perl+sh and I don&#039;t see a good reason to introduce another language in the mix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@funktree: first the rewrite is already done so I won&#8217;t redo it a second time. Then I never used haskell and dpkg is only C+perl+sh and I don&#8217;t see a good reason to introduce another language in the mix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: funktree</title>
		<link>http://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/05/27/rewriting-update-alternatives-in-c/#comment-3105</link>
		<dc:creator>funktree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 17:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphaelhertzog.com/?p=271#comment-3105</guid>
		<description>hey, why don&#039;t switch to haskell? it can describe complex operations and dataflows very succinctly, and it compiles to native code. a suggestion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey, why don&#8217;t switch to haskell? it can describe complex operations and dataflows very succinctly, and it compiles to native code. a suggestion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: funktree</title>
		<link>http://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/05/27/rewriting-update-alternatives-in-c/#comment-3102</link>
		<dc:creator>funktree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 14:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphaelhertzog.com/?p=271#comment-3102</guid>
		<description>haskell</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haskell</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

